EduMDAI Ethical Digital Pedagogy Pyramid: A Systematic Human-AI Collaborative Framework for Teaching, Learning and Assessment
Keywords:
EduMDAI Ethical Digital Education Pedagogy, Human-AI Collaboration, Human Cognitive Agency, Ethical Artificial Intelligence, Teaching and Learning AssessmentAbstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in education creates opportunities for personalized learning while raising concerns about learner dependence, weakened cognitive agency and ethical decision-making. This study introduces the EduMDAI Ethical Digital Education Pedagogy Pyramid, a pedagogical innovation situated within Stage 2: Facilitating (during teaching and learning) of the overarching EduMDAI Model: Ethical Digital Education Pedagogy Framework. The framework is elaborated through the systematic alignment of three structures: the Cognitive Structure, the Teaching and Learning Implementation Structure, and the Assessment Structure. Its five-phase sequence progresses from 100% Human to 100% Human, Human + AI, Human + AI and, finally, 100% Human. The initial phases develop learners’ own knowledge and understanding; the middle phases support AI-assisted exploration, evaluation and product development; and the final phase restores independent reflection and responsibility to humans. The corresponding assessment architecture links diagnostic, formative, process-based, authentic/performance and reflective assessment to the respective phases. The principal outcome of this development is an integrated, platform-independent pedagogical design that clearly distinguishes human cognitive agency from the use of digital tools and positions educators as leaders and AI as a navigator. The framework provides an operational basis for designing observable learning activities and assessment evidence rather than established evidence of effectiveness. Future classroom research should evaluate usability, learning outcomes, critical thinking and responsible AI use. The Pyramid offers a systematic, ethically guided approach to human-AI collaboration in which AI supports rather than replaces human thinking and intelligence.
References
Chang, A. (2025). Trainee teachers’ acceptance of EduMDAI as a progressive pedagogy platform towards ethical digital education. Progress in Computers and Learning, 5(1), 12–27. https://karyailham.com.my/index.php/picl/article/view/683
Chen, S., & Cheung, A. C. K. (2025). Effect of generative artificial intelligence on university students learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 100737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100737
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., & Wen, Z. (2025). Can generative AI revolutionise academic skills development in higher education? A systematic literature review. European Journal of Education, 60, e70036. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70036
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners’ critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0
Liu, X., & Zhong, B. (2025). Integrating generative artificial intelligence into student learning: A systematic review from a TPACK perspective. Educational Research Review, 100741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100741
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-students
Wang, X., Zainuddin, Z., & Chin, H. L. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in pedagogical practices: A systematic review of empirical studies (2022–2024). Cogent Education, 12(1), 2485499. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499
Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., et al. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z
European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. https://education.ec.europa.eu/news/ethical-guidelines-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-and-data-in-teaching-and-learning-for-educators
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education-A tool on whose terms? https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology
United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisha Chang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors of MJII retain copyright to the content of the articles.
The content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 which allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, republished, or otherwise re-used for any purpose, including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed without any restriction.
Authors Rights
The Journal grants you the following non-exclusive rights, subject to giving propoer acknowledgement to the original journal. The authors may:
(i) to reprint or reproduce the contribution, in whole or in part, in any publication of your interest.
(ii) to use material for teaching purposes; including availability of the matarial in academic course.
(iii) to post a copy of the contribution on your personal or institutional web server, provided that the server is non-commercial and there are no charges for access, and
(iv) to deposit a copy of the contribution in a non-commercial data repository maintained by an institution of which you are a member.
Author's Agreement
Author(s) guarantee the journal the following:
(i) that the contribution is their original work;
(ii) that it contains, no matter what, content that is defamatory or is otherwise unlawful or which invades rights of privacy or publicity or infringes any proprietary rights (including copyright);
(iii) that the contribution has not been published elsewhere in whole or in part and that no agreement to publish is outstanding other than this agreement. Author(s) agree to be responsible and hold the journal, its editors, staff and affiliate organizations harmless against any claims arising from or related to the breach or inaccuracy of any of the guarantees listed above.
Disclaimer
The editorial team of the MJII and the publication team of Academica Press Solutions share no responsibility regarding the views and opinions expressed by the authors.
The content published in MJII is Open Access and can be shared, adapted, reproduced, reprinted, after appropriate acknowledgment and giving due credit to the author(s) work.
